作
家 |
通知: 跨国外贸论坛维护中,发文请登陆跨国会员区--其他功能--发布外贸文章(需实名),欢迎外贸相关服务企业参与。 |
11楼 BruceHuang
 等级:博士后 发帖数:45 回帖数:2567
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 10:53:17 | 以下是引用ZIGIC在2006-11-1 10:40:32的发言: 文武双全的高手,阐述了那么多,想挑刺,却反出破绽,不合算! 你这次的丢脸是你太想打击对手了,还好意思反问什么:“就你看出是修改了?” 我想以你的水平,在知道是修改的前提下,就不会在前面分析老半天了。 |
Who confirmed that the I/Q is just I/O? only you? All right! U appeared again! Such a name! I certainly know what you want to do! So, now, don’t stop! do not declare here that you don’t know the below! Do not say that you are reluctant to reply the below! What are the full descriptions for the below? What are the Chinese names for the below? : - PB,BCL,POP,A/O,B4,A/S,AVE,B/D,C/M,C/O,D/D,D/O,EEE,ETS,HX,I/O,IVF,O/A,PYT,SB,S/D,TMW,UOS,V,W/I,W/O,W/T,OM FCO … You can assist your teacher(maybe yourself) to reply the above!] 本帖子2006-11-01 10:56:22由BruceHuang进行编辑!!
------------------ ...
| |
12楼 ZIGIC
 等级:初中生 发帖数:1 回帖数:191
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 11:06:20 | Who confirmed that the I/Q is just I/O? Why don't you answer this question?
------------------ ...
| |
13楼 BruceHuang
 等级:博士后 发帖数:45 回帖数:2567
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 11:33:59 | 以下是引用ZIGIC在2006-11-1 11:06:20的发言: Who confirmed that the I/Q is just I/O? Why don't you answer this question? |
Well! It’s funny! ZIGIC, just keep this topic’s talking as English edition! If you like to change to comment by another language, it will mean that you lose somewhat. Don’t you agree? Actually I already answered the above question. First, nobody thinks that the I/Q is standard writing, it doesn’t exist in any English dictionary, of course, as abbreviation, the I/O means Instead Of, but, who can regard I/Q as I/O? meanwhile, it’s very obvious, who has confirmed that the above sentence mentioned in the LZ topic was used in the customer or the bank’s L/C amendment? Just guessed it by yourself? Furthermore, you must reply the below, otherwise, it does not mean that you haven enough ability to discuss many biz topics here, at least, anything you speak is meaningless. “PB,BCL,POP,A/O,B4,A/S,AVE,B/D,C/M,C/O,D/D,D/O,EEE,ETS,HX,I/O,IVF,O/A,PYT,SB,S/D,TMW,UOS,V,W/I,W/O,W/T,OM FCO …” Looking forward to having your correct reply here! 本帖子2006-11-01 11:39:14由BruceHuang进行编辑!!
------------------ ...
| |
14楼 BruceHuang
 等级:博士后 发帖数:45 回帖数:2567
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 11:39:41 | 以下是引用ZIGIC在2006-11-1 11:06:20的发言: Who confirmed that the I/Q is just I/O? Why don't you answer this question? |
Well! It’s funny! ZIGIC, just keep this topic’s talking as English edition! If you like to change to comment by another language, it will mean that you lose somewhat. Don’t you agree? Actually I already answered the above question. First, nobody thinks that the I/Q is standard writing, it doesn’t exist in any English dictionary, of course, as abbreviation, the I/O means Instead Of, but, who can regard I/Q as I/O? meanwhile, it’s very obvious, who has confirmed that the above sentence mentioned in the LZ topic was used in the customer or the bank’s L/C amendment? Just guessed it by yourself? Furthermore, you must reply the below, otherwise, it does not mean that you haven enough ability to discuss many biz topics here, at least, anything you speak is meaningless. “PB,BCL,POP,A/O,B4,A/S,AVE,B/D,C/M,C/O,D/D,D/O,EEE,ETS,HX,I/O,IVF,O/A,PYT,SB,S/D,TMW,UOS,V,W/I,W/O,W/T,OM FCO …” Looking forward to having your correct reply here!
------------------ ...
| |
15楼 ZIGIC
 等级:初中生 发帖数:1 回帖数:191
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 11:48:30 | 楼主没有告诉这个是修改,对判断这句话的真实意思添了些麻烦。不过油条弄出来,说明他的水平和经验。当然你可能觉得会偶然。但是既然油条把这个东西提示出来了,其实以你的高水平(别误解,是真话)应该也会理解、同意的,我觉得你是太想辩论有点走火入魔了。
------------------ ...
| |
16楼 BruceHuang
 等级:博士后 发帖数:45 回帖数:2567
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 11:53:10 | 以下是引用ZIGIC在2006-11-1 11:48:30的发言: 楼主没有告诉这个是修改,对判断这句话的真实意思添了些麻烦。不过油条弄出来,说明他的水平和经验。当然你可能觉得会偶然。但是既然油条把这个东西提示出来了,其实以你的高水平(别误解,是真话)应该也会理解、同 |
U hv break the rules between us.
------------------ ...
| |
17楼 BruceHuang
 等级:博士后 发帖数:45 回帖数:2567
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 12:06:57 | 以下是引用ZIGIC在2006-11-1 11:48:30的发言: 楼主没有告诉这个是修改,对判断这句话的真实意思添了些麻烦。不过油条弄出来,说明他的水平和经验。当然你可能觉得会偶然。但是既然油条把这个东西提示出来了,其实以你的高水平(别误解,是真话)应该也会理解、同 |
不肯用英语交流,只得迁就你了。 当然,楼主说明了句子是出现在L/C,L/C的修改书或客户随意的手稿,都是不同的猜测。 如果“I/Q”出现在李咏、陈启泰或者曾志伟的电视节目的话,我们当然还理解为“智力测试”呢!
------------------ ...
| |
18楼 genard
 等级:博士后 发帖数:13 回帖数:3515
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 12:28:23 | 这能算什么水平?碰巧而已! ----本人未能免俗,前期闲时学你逗了一阵疯狗,如今看到你的签名,甚感惭愧! 你的露面,至少可以让那些说"ZIGIC是本人的马甲"的屁话,不攻自破!---至于其它,我想还是不必争论啦吧?! 以下是引用ZIGIC在2006-11-1 11:48:30的发言: 楼主没有告诉这个是修改,对判断这句话的真实意思添了些麻烦。不过油条弄出来,说明他的水平和经验。当然你可能觉得会偶然。但是既然油条把这个东西提示出来了,其实以你的高水平(别误解,是真话)应该也会理解、同 |
------------------ ...
| |
19楼 BruceHuang
 等级:博士后 发帖数:45 回帖数:2567
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 12:34:40 | 以下是引用genard在2006-11-1 12:28:23的发言: 这能算什么水平?碰巧而已! ----本人未能免俗,前期闲时学你逗了一阵疯狗,如今看到你的签名,甚感惭愧! 你的露面,至少可以让那些说"ZIGIC是本人的马甲"的屁话,不攻自破!---至于其它,我想还是不必争论啦吧?! [QUOTE][ |
是的,就你高水平了。什么条件我都公平地开出来了,就你不敢选择和面对!以下这帖子你何以总是逃避? http:// *域名隐藏* importer(dot)net/view_topic/ *域名隐藏*
------------------ ...
| |
20楼 genard
 等级:博士后 发帖数:13 回帖数:3515
| 发帖时间 - 2006/11/1 12:41:53 | 呵呵,只想告诉你:***都不及格,能论到你来提什么条件?!----太把自己当回事啦! 以下是引用BruceHuang在2006-11-1 12:34:40的发言: 是的,就你高水平了。什么条件我都公平地开出来了,就你不敢选择和面对!以下这帖子你何以总是逃避? |
------------------ ...
| |